B&S F tuba test drive at Baltimore Brass
Forum rules
This section is for posts that are directly related to performance, performers, or equipment. Social issues are allowed, as long as they are directly related to those categories. If you see a post that you cannot respond to with respect and courtesy, we ask that you do not respond at all.
This section is for posts that are directly related to performance, performers, or equipment. Social issues are allowed, as long as they are directly related to those categories. If you see a post that you cannot respond to with respect and courtesy, we ask that you do not respond at all.
- bloke
- Mid South Music
- Posts: 24348
- Joined: Thu Aug 13, 2020 8:55 am
- Location: western Tennessee - near Memphis
- Has thanked: 5219 times
- Been thanked: 5881 times
Re: B&S F tuba test drive at Baltimore Brass
I haven't had the best luck with condition of rotors when buying used from Germany.
I would hope that this particular tuba has good valves.
I would hope that this particular tuba has good valves.
Re: B&S F tuba test drive at Baltimore Brass
I’ve been eyeing that silver 4260 they’ve got there… Don’t need it, but man, I’m sure that thing is stellar…
Meinl Weston "6465"
Meinl Weston 2141
Willson 3200RZ-5
Holton 345
Holton 350
Conn Double-Bell Euphonium
Meinl Weston 2141
Willson 3200RZ-5
Holton 345
Holton 350
Conn Double-Bell Euphonium
-
Heavy_Metal
- Posts: 503
- Joined: Sat Aug 15, 2020 5:23 pm
- Location: Baltimore, MD, USA
- Has thanked: 86 times
- Been thanked: 159 times
Re: B&S F tuba test drive at Baltimore Brass
@prodigal , so what did you get for your son?
Principal tuba, Bel Air Community Band
Old (early 1900s?) Alexander BBb proto-163
1976 Sonora (B&S 101) 4-rotor BBb
~1904 York 3P BBb Helicon
Old Alex Comp.F, in shop
Old (early 1900s?) Alexander BBb proto-163
1976 Sonora (B&S 101) 4-rotor BBb
~1904 York 3P BBb Helicon
Old Alex Comp.F, in shop
Re: B&S F tuba test drive at Baltimore Brass
A pretty nice PT-1!
1960 186CC
B&S 5099/PT-15
Cerveny 653
A bunch of string instruments
B&S 5099/PT-15
Cerveny 653
A bunch of string instruments
Re: B&S F tuba test drive at Baltimore Brass
I played one of these last year in the Tuba Showroom down in Jacksonville, Fl. Had I the cash at the time, I would've bought it up immediately. I played something like 12-14 F tubas there... of those, it came down to 3: A Meinl Weston 2182, a Meinl Weston 4240, and the 3100. The B&S played better than those two by about 10% and everything else I tried there by at least 40%. Whoever bought that horn got something really fine.C J wrote: Fri Apr 17, 2026 1:01 pmThe 3100 with the graduated is still on the German website:Rick Denney wrote: Fri Apr 17, 2026 7:00 am @prodigal, I haven't seen a 3100 with the old Symphonie graduated bore on the B&S website for a while now. It used to be designated the PT-9, but they have gotten rid of all the PT designations at this point. I didn't seen any with a bore reported at less than 19mm.
https://de.b-and-s.com/bs_DE_de/f-tuba- ... 2-0gb.html
Romans 3:23, 24
B&S MRP-C
Bessson New Standard 17" BBb Bass
Boosey & Hawkes Imperial 19" Eb Bass
John Packer 379 FF
B&S MRP-C
Bessson New Standard 17" BBb Bass
Boosey & Hawkes Imperial 19" Eb Bass
John Packer 379 FF
- bloke
- Mid South Music
- Posts: 24348
- Joined: Thu Aug 13, 2020 8:55 am
- Location: western Tennessee - near Memphis
- Has thanked: 5219 times
- Been thanked: 5881 times
Re: B&S F tuba test drive at Baltimore Brass
Everything that's a enlargened version of a B&S F Symphonie model doesn't play as well as a Symphonie model. Most all of them (simply) are more work to achieve not-quite-as-good results.
All of them (it just seems to me) are failed attempts to make the range below the staff respond the same way the same pitches respond on C-length instruments.
Even C-length instruments don't respond in the same way (in that same range) as B-flat instruments, whereby B-flat instruments respond better in that range.
B-flat instruments:
- B-flat below the staff generally responds better (vs. C instruments), because two additional feet of expanding bugle are engaged.
- C below the staff generally responds better, because - rather than the "hollow" sound obtained from a 16-feet open bugle - it engages (not only) an 18-feet bugle, but several more feet of cylindrical tubing, which adds even more "teeth" to the sound. (but tuning the 4th valve to low F, and expecting a tuned-flat-for-C 4th circuit to resonate beautifully when "lipped" up to in-tune isn't the ticket. The way to "kick butt" on the pitch "C" on a B-flat instrument is to play it with valves 1-3, and pull slide #1 for tuning.)
During my final days of playing C instruments (after playing C instruments for 50 years or so) I found myself (quite often) playing C below the staff (rather than "open") with valves 5-1-3 (for that "B-flat tuba-sounding" low C). ...that "surprise" super-loud C (just after the bassoon decending arpeggio in Tchaik 6)...ALWAYS play that on a C tuba with valves 5-1-3. It will cause the patrons to freakin' jump out of their seats!
(and put a huge smile on the M.D.'s face as well). like this: https://www.facebook.com/reel/1784069444969174 Excuse someone's cell phone recording quality.
Gene Pokorny:
DECADES AGO - when I would study with him of-and-on - at least once in every single session - he would relate the B-flat tuba sonority to valve combinations. Notice that he now often plays (albeit one of those "pretty good for the money ones") a B-flat instrument in the orchestra.
the ol' bloke:
Last night - playing all of those epic John Williams movie compositions on the easily-played-in-tune-and-remarkably-resonant "Fat Bastard" (though I played "Jaws" and an "E.T." piece with the Symphonie F tuba, and covered a "Raiders" 4th trombone part on the cimbasso) I felt a bit giddy.
...that first low B-flat in the "Star Wars" main title...(as loud as one can play with a beautiful sonorous sound - and with a tuba that is just chomping at the bit to do it...)















All of them (it just seems to me) are failed attempts to make the range below the staff respond the same way the same pitches respond on C-length instruments.
Even C-length instruments don't respond in the same way (in that same range) as B-flat instruments, whereby B-flat instruments respond better in that range.
B-flat instruments:
- B-flat below the staff generally responds better (vs. C instruments), because two additional feet of expanding bugle are engaged.
- C below the staff generally responds better, because - rather than the "hollow" sound obtained from a 16-feet open bugle - it engages (not only) an 18-feet bugle, but several more feet of cylindrical tubing, which adds even more "teeth" to the sound. (but tuning the 4th valve to low F, and expecting a tuned-flat-for-C 4th circuit to resonate beautifully when "lipped" up to in-tune isn't the ticket. The way to "kick butt" on the pitch "C" on a B-flat instrument is to play it with valves 1-3, and pull slide #1 for tuning.)
During my final days of playing C instruments (after playing C instruments for 50 years or so) I found myself (quite often) playing C below the staff (rather than "open") with valves 5-1-3 (for that "B-flat tuba-sounding" low C). ...that "surprise" super-loud C (just after the bassoon decending arpeggio in Tchaik 6)...ALWAYS play that on a C tuba with valves 5-1-3. It will cause the patrons to freakin' jump out of their seats!
Gene Pokorny:
DECADES AGO - when I would study with him of-and-on - at least once in every single session - he would relate the B-flat tuba sonority to valve combinations. Notice that he now often plays (albeit one of those "pretty good for the money ones") a B-flat instrument in the orchestra.
the ol' bloke:
Last night - playing all of those epic John Williams movie compositions on the easily-played-in-tune-and-remarkably-resonant "Fat Bastard" (though I played "Jaws" and an "E.T." piece with the Symphonie F tuba, and covered a "Raiders" 4th trombone part on the cimbasso) I felt a bit giddy.
...that first low B-flat in the "Star Wars" main title...(as loud as one can play with a beautiful sonorous sound - and with a tuba that is just chomping at the bit to do it...)
- These users thanked the author bloke for the post (total 2):
- prodigal (Sun Apr 26, 2026 6:51 pm) • TheBerlinerTuba (Mon Apr 27, 2026 4:18 am)
Re: B&S F tuba test drive at Baltimore Brass
I'll try 5-1-3 out tomorrow. It sounds fun!
If Karl Kinser built a tuba, it would be the Symphonie. (Karl Kinser is a legendary sprint car mechanic, probably the best.)
If Karl Kinser built a tuba, it would be the Symphonie. (Karl Kinser is a legendary sprint car mechanic, probably the best.)
1960 186CC
B&S 5099/PT-15
Cerveny 653
A bunch of string instruments
B&S 5099/PT-15
Cerveny 653
A bunch of string instruments
Re: B&S F tuba test drive at Baltimore Brass
bloke: I tried 5-1-3 on my 186, and I got a rather interesting sounding B natural. I have the old, long Mirafone 5th valve (I set mine to play F as 5-2-3).
I think the newer 21st century Miraphones have a shorter 5th valve, correct?
I played the 186CC with the band today. It was fun, they need a tuba player. I'd play their concert, but it's the same night of my daughters' orchestra concert, where I'm helping and playing bass as well. The bass is okay, but if playing a contrabass tuba is like driving a truck, playing the bass is like steering a supertanker.
I think the newer 21st century Miraphones have a shorter 5th valve, correct?
I played the 186CC with the band today. It was fun, they need a tuba player. I'd play their concert, but it's the same night of my daughters' orchestra concert, where I'm helping and playing bass as well. The bass is okay, but if playing a contrabass tuba is like driving a truck, playing the bass is like steering a supertanker.
1960 186CC
B&S 5099/PT-15
Cerveny 653
A bunch of string instruments
B&S 5099/PT-15
Cerveny 653
A bunch of string instruments
- bloke
- Mid South Music
- Posts: 24348
- Joined: Thu Aug 13, 2020 8:55 am
- Location: western Tennessee - near Memphis
- Has thanked: 5219 times
- Been thanked: 5881 times
Re: B&S F tuba test drive at Baltimore Brass
LOL...
Yeah with the "compensating minor third" style fifth valve, you're not going to get a c natural with 513.
Yeah with the "compensating minor third" style fifth valve, you're not going to get a c natural with 513.
- bloke
- Mid South Music
- Posts: 24348
- Joined: Thu Aug 13, 2020 8:55 am
- Location: western Tennessee - near Memphis
- Has thanked: 5219 times
- Been thanked: 5881 times
Re: B&S F tuba test drive at Baltimore Brass
I haven't tried that one, I'll give it a go tomorrow!
Getting to 5 is most of my problem right now, I'm still getting used to 5 on the left hand with both the 186 and the PT-15.
Getting to 5 is most of my problem right now, I'm still getting used to 5 on the left hand with both the 186 and the PT-15.
1960 186CC
B&S 5099/PT-15
Cerveny 653
A bunch of string instruments
B&S 5099/PT-15
Cerveny 653
A bunch of string instruments
Re: B&S F tuba test drive at Baltimore Brass
C J wrote: Fri Apr 17, 2026 1:01 pmThe 3100 with the graduated is still on the German website:Rick Denney wrote: Fri Apr 17, 2026 7:00 am @prodigal, I haven't seen a 3100 with the old Symphonie graduated bore on the B&S website for a while now. It used to be designated the PT-9, but they have gotten rid of all the PT designations at this point. I didn't seen any with a bore reported at less than 19mm.
https://de.b-and-s.com/bs_DE_de/f-tuba- ... 2-0gb.html
And here is something to think about for Bort2.0
https://www.kleinanzeigen.de/s-anzeige/ ... 02-74-8700
or
https://www.kleinanzeigen.de/s-anzeige/ ... 2-74-23770
![]()
1960 186CC
B&S 5099/PT-15
Cerveny 653
A bunch of string instruments
B&S 5099/PT-15
Cerveny 653
A bunch of string instruments
