Quality BBb Tubas

Tubas, euphoniums, mouthpieces, and anything music-related.
Forum rules
This section is for posts that are directly related to performance, performers, or equipment. Social issues are allowed, as long as they are directly related to those categories. If you see a post that you cannot respond to with respect and courtesy, we ask that you do not respond at all.
catgrowlB
Posts: 318
Joined: Tue Jun 13, 2023 8:46 pm
Has thanked: 296 times
Been thanked: 124 times

Re: Quality BBb Tubas

Post by catgrowlB »

prodigal wrote: Thu Apr 16, 2026 9:01 am

As of yesterday, I will say that the B&S PT-1 is a fine BBb tuba!

I'm beginning to really believe that B&S tubas are the most efficient for dynamics and tone per cubic liter of air blown through them. The PT-1 doesn't seem anywhere near as much of an air hog as it should be, it feels far larger than a 186 BBb. You really have to work to make its teeth show, which can be good and bad, but it has a large deep voice for its size.
Yeah, the old B&S PT-1, VMI 2103/103, are all the same model tuba with the only difference in the PT-1 having a 19" bell, the VMI 103 a 17.7" bell. Otherwise same exact tuba. The larger bell of the PT-1 in particular will round out and broaden the sound a bit. It's actually a pretty smooth, round sounding tuba for a typical rotary BBb. Maybe not quite the 'horsepower' of the MW-25, but maybe a little more subtle, buttery quality.

I don't think the outer bows are any larger than the Mira 186, but it's a more open, larger wrap on the PT-1/103. And the PT-1/103 is a tall tuba, with the PT-1 in particular having a larger bell than the Mira 186. So the PT-1 definitely looks and feels larger. Only thing is the PT-1/103 tubas all play a little different, but all good. Some can be superb :cheers:
These users thanked the author catgrowlB for the post:
prodigal (Fri Apr 17, 2026 12:12 pm)


Post Reply