Sellmansberger Symphony vs. OG Cup
Forum rules
This section is for posts that are directly related to performance, performers, or equipment. Social issues are allowed, as long as they are directly related to those categories. If you see a post that you cannot respond to with respect and courtesy, we ask that you do not respond at all.
This section is for posts that are directly related to performance, performers, or equipment. Social issues are allowed, as long as they are directly related to those categories. If you see a post that you cannot respond to with respect and courtesy, we ask that you do not respond at all.
- russiantuba
- Posts: 752
- Joined: Thu Aug 13, 2020 8:04 am
- Location: Circleville, Ohio
- Has thanked: 61 times
- Been thanked: 324 times
- Contact:
Sellmansberger Symphony vs. OG Cup
After reading another post on here about a Geib mouthpiece, I was checking the throat specs of the Sellmansberger Symphony that I have to compare (I have an old Geib and never thought of comparing the throats). I always thought the Orchestra Grand Cup and Symphony were essentially the same and that the feature difference was the shank being more restrictive, less color, etc. and was shocked to find out it mentions the OG has a slight more open top of the mouthpiece.
This actually intrigues me for a "weightier" sound on my big horn compared to the symphony cup. Otherwise, are they basically the same, especially with the bottom part of the mouthpiece? I was considering, if I can get mine unseized, trying the OG cup with a symphony shank. I do not want to go down the mouthpiece rabbit hole, but before I make any potential changes, was wondering if anyone has tried this (cups only) to see a difference.
This actually intrigues me for a "weightier" sound on my big horn compared to the symphony cup. Otherwise, are they basically the same, especially with the bottom part of the mouthpiece? I was considering, if I can get mine unseized, trying the OG cup with a symphony shank. I do not want to go down the mouthpiece rabbit hole, but before I make any potential changes, was wondering if anyone has tried this (cups only) to see a difference.
Dr. James M. Green
Lecturer in Music--Ohio Northern University
Adjunct Professor of Music--Ohio Christian University
Gronitz PF 125
Miraphone 1291CC
Miraphone Performing Artist
www.russiantuba.com
Lecturer in Music--Ohio Northern University
Adjunct Professor of Music--Ohio Christian University
Gronitz PF 125
Miraphone 1291CC
Miraphone Performing Artist
www.russiantuba.com
- The Brute Squad
- Posts: 162
- Joined: Wed Jan 12, 2022 10:55 am
- Location: Middleton, WI
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 54 times
Re: Sellmansberger Symphony vs. OG Cup
This was the combination I used with my previous horn (BMB J-865) and it worked really well for that horn. When I bought my current DS, I bought the inverse components to try the different combinations to see what worked better, and I wound up going all Symphony.russiantuba wrote: Fri Mar 13, 2026 7:28 am I was considering, if I can get mine unseized, trying the OG cup with a symphony shank.
It's been a few years, so I can't explain the differences as if I just tried them out, but while the differences are pretty subtle, they're definitely there.
Joe K
Player of tuba, taker of photos, breaker of things (mostly software)
Miraphone 181 F w/ GW Matanuska/Yamaha John Griffiths
Kalison Daryl Smith w/ Blokepiece (#2 32.6, Symphony cup and shank)
Player of tuba, taker of photos, breaker of things (mostly software)
Miraphone 181 F w/ GW Matanuska/Yamaha John Griffiths
Kalison Daryl Smith w/ Blokepiece (#2 32.6, Symphony cup and shank)
- bloke
- Mid South Music
- Posts: 24358
- Joined: Thu Aug 13, 2020 8:55 am
- Location: western Tennessee - near Memphis
- Has thanked: 5223 times
- Been thanked: 5885 times
Re: Sellmansberger Symphony vs. OG Cup
The junction (three piece version) is the same dimension (whereas either of those back bores will bolt up to either of those cups), but the diameter of the throat itself is different.
In the Symphony back bore/throat shank piece (if talking about the ones that come apart into three pieces), the place where the cup turns the corner into the back bore (what appears to be the throat) is really quite large - as with a lot of these other modern era makes' mouthpieces, but then there's a reverse taper (to a smaller diameter) and a venturi down inside the back bore itself.
At different times with various instruments, I've used the cup and back bore combination that you are considering. It's a useful mouthpiece.
In the Symphony back bore/throat shank piece (if talking about the ones that come apart into three pieces), the place where the cup turns the corner into the back bore (what appears to be the throat) is really quite large - as with a lot of these other modern era makes' mouthpieces, but then there's a reverse taper (to a smaller diameter) and a venturi down inside the back bore itself.
At different times with various instruments, I've used the cup and back bore combination that you are considering. It's a useful mouthpiece.
- russiantuba
- Posts: 752
- Joined: Thu Aug 13, 2020 8:04 am
- Location: Circleville, Ohio
- Has thanked: 61 times
- Been thanked: 324 times
- Contact:
Re: Sellmansberger Symphony vs. OG Cup
So the only big difference in the cup is the descent into the throat itself? How would you describe the sound of OG with symphony shank versus the stock 3 piece symphony?bloke wrote: Fri Mar 13, 2026 9:30 am The junction (three piece version) is the same dimension (whereas either of those back bores will bolt up to either of those cups), but the diameter of the throat itself is different.
In the Symphony back bore/throat shank piece (if talking about the ones that come apart into three pieces), the place where the cup turns the corner into the back bore (what appears to be the throat) is really quite large - as with a lot of these other modern era makes' mouthpieces, but then there's a reverse taper (to a smaller diameter) and a venturi down inside the back bore itself.
At different times with various instruments, I've used the cup and back bore combination that you are considering. It's a useful mouthpiece.
Dr. James M. Green
Lecturer in Music--Ohio Northern University
Adjunct Professor of Music--Ohio Christian University
Gronitz PF 125
Miraphone 1291CC
Miraphone Performing Artist
www.russiantuba.com
Lecturer in Music--Ohio Northern University
Adjunct Professor of Music--Ohio Christian University
Gronitz PF 125
Miraphone 1291CC
Miraphone Performing Artist
www.russiantuba.com
- Rick Denney
- Resident Genius
- Posts: 1124
- Joined: Thu Aug 13, 2020 8:24 am
- Has thanked: 77 times
- Been thanked: 433 times
Re: Sellmansberger Symphony vs. OG Cup
For me, the OG with a Symphony shank provides a bit more color and maybe resistance for a dark rotary tuba. I use that combination on my Hirsbrunner. I use the OG with an OG backbore on the Holton.russiantuba wrote: Fri Mar 13, 2026 10:49 amSo the only big difference in the cup is the descent into the throat itself? How would you describe the sound of OG with symphony shank versus the stock 3 piece symphony?bloke wrote: Fri Mar 13, 2026 9:30 am The junction (three piece version) is the same dimension (whereas either of those back bores will bolt up to either of those cups), but the diameter of the throat itself is different.
In the Symphony back bore/throat shank piece (if talking about the ones that come apart into three pieces), the place where the cup turns the corner into the back bore (what appears to be the throat) is really quite large - as with a lot of these other modern era makes' mouthpieces, but then there's a reverse taper (to a smaller diameter) and a venturi down inside the back bore itself.
At different times with various instruments, I've used the cup and back bore combination that you are considering. It's a useful mouthpiece.
To be honest, I'm not sure to what extent the difference is real or important. I think you'll just have to try it. If it doesn't add anything, sell it--someone will always being buying those parts.
Rick "who'll do a comparison on the Hirsbrunner tonight and report back" Denney
- bloke
- Mid South Music
- Posts: 24358
- Joined: Thu Aug 13, 2020 8:55 am
- Location: western Tennessee - near Memphis
- Has thanked: 5223 times
- Been thanked: 5885 times
Re: Sellmansberger Symphony vs. OG Cup
Those two cups are different.
Running the fingertip from bottom to top immediately demonstrates the differences. They are close to the same depth and the bottoms were justified in the three piece version so that the different throats and backbores could be interchangeable.
The brass version of the OG is not justified, and is just like my prototype.
Running the fingertip from bottom to top immediately demonstrates the differences. They are close to the same depth and the bottoms were justified in the three piece version so that the different throats and backbores could be interchangeable.
The brass version of the OG is not justified, and is just like my prototype.
- russiantuba
- Posts: 752
- Joined: Thu Aug 13, 2020 8:04 am
- Location: Circleville, Ohio
- Has thanked: 61 times
- Been thanked: 324 times
- Contact:
Re: Sellmansberger Symphony vs. OG Cup
Is the OG a bit bigger or “more bowl” rounded at the bottom? Again, I love my symphony, but something with a bit “taller” depth to it (not wider, not deeper, not more open or throatier), would be enough to warrant a change—à la an Alexander 163 type sound vs a Thor type sound
Dr. James M. Green
Lecturer in Music--Ohio Northern University
Adjunct Professor of Music--Ohio Christian University
Gronitz PF 125
Miraphone 1291CC
Miraphone Performing Artist
www.russiantuba.com
Lecturer in Music--Ohio Northern University
Adjunct Professor of Music--Ohio Christian University
Gronitz PF 125
Miraphone 1291CC
Miraphone Performing Artist
www.russiantuba.com
- arpthark
- Posts: 5771
- Joined: Mon Aug 24, 2020 4:25 pm
- Has thanked: 1773 times
- Been thanked: 1912 times
Re: Sellmansberger Symphony vs. OG Cup
Using the OG Ultimate on a Rudi 5/4 CC today playing Dvorak 6.

Re: Sellmansberger Symphony vs. OG Cup
Pictures or it didn't happen!arpthark wrote: Sun Mar 15, 2026 11:04 am Using the OG Ultimate on a Rudi 5/4 CC today playing Dvorak 6.
![]()
![]()
![]()
Todd Morgan
Besson 995
Rudy Meinl 4/4 CC
Mr. P 5.0
Besson 995
Rudy Meinl 4/4 CC
Mr. P 5.0
Re: Sellmansberger Symphony vs. OG Cup
That being said, I'm using the OG ultimate lately on my 2155 (with a XD/Profundo style rim). I'd love to use a standard depth symphony/OGU but this horn behaves (pitch wise) better with a little deeper cup for me.Pauvog1 wrote: Sat Mar 14, 2026 12:26 pm The stainless OG has a little more burn/focus/clarity forward type sound, while the symphony is a little rounder/prettier.
MW 2155
PT-18p (MRP)
JP 274 MKII
PT-18p (MRP)
JP 274 MKII
- russiantuba
- Posts: 752
- Joined: Thu Aug 13, 2020 8:04 am
- Location: Circleville, Ohio
- Has thanked: 61 times
- Been thanked: 324 times
- Contact:
Re: Sellmansberger Symphony vs. OG Cup
I thought this was merely due to the shank on the 3 piece. This is probably the opposite direction I want to go if it is the cup too since I am a more aggressive player by nature. Thanks for this!Pauvog1 wrote: Sat Mar 14, 2026 12:26 pm The stainless OG has a little more burn/focus/clarity forward type sound, while the symphony is a little rounder/prettier.
- These users thanked the author russiantuba for the post:
- Pauvog1 (Sun Mar 15, 2026 8:15 pm)
Dr. James M. Green
Lecturer in Music--Ohio Northern University
Adjunct Professor of Music--Ohio Christian University
Gronitz PF 125
Miraphone 1291CC
Miraphone Performing Artist
www.russiantuba.com
Lecturer in Music--Ohio Northern University
Adjunct Professor of Music--Ohio Christian University
Gronitz PF 125
Miraphone 1291CC
Miraphone Performing Artist
www.russiantuba.com
Re: Sellmansberger Symphony vs. OG Cup
I never used an OG shank on my OG cup. I used symphony or larger from Dave. Same effect.russiantuba wrote: Sun Mar 15, 2026 8:13 pmI thought this was merely due to the shank on the 3 piece. This is probably the opposite direction I want to go if it is the cup too since I am a more aggressive player by nature. Thanks for this!Pauvog1 wrote: Sat Mar 14, 2026 12:26 pm The stainless OG has a little more burn/focus/clarity forward type sound, while the symphony is a little rounder/prettier.
MW 2155
PT-18p (MRP)
JP 274 MKII
PT-18p (MRP)
JP 274 MKII
Re: Sellmansberger Symphony vs. OG Cup
I find the OGU with a Profundo/XD rim to be a better "fit for me". Maybe I should re-visit my OG, OG, lolrussiantuba wrote: Sun Mar 15, 2026 8:13 pmI thought this was merely due to the shank on the 3 piece. This is probably the opposite direction I want to go if it is the cup too since I am a more aggressive player by nature. Thanks for this!Pauvog1 wrote: Sat Mar 14, 2026 12:26 pm The stainless OG has a little more burn/focus/clarity forward type sound, while the symphony is a little rounder/prettier.
MW 2155
PT-18p (MRP)
JP 274 MKII
PT-18p (MRP)
JP 274 MKII
