licensed forgeries
Posted: Sat Nov 08, 2025 4:03 pm
We've all seen forgeries of Mark VI saxophones, Les Paul guitars, Bach Stradivarius trumpets, sports equipment and all sorts of things...
...not knock-offs, but full-blown forgeries (with the name and everything engraved on them).
A FEW of the forgeries (and I've encountered a few like this) are every bit as good as the real thing, but - yet - are not the real thing.
I just saw where an American company (known historically by us for many models of tubas, but not-so-much now) just introduced a (NOT-a-tuba) new model of woodwind.
big deal...anniversary of the founding of the company, etc...limited production, and all that stuff...
The cosmetics and engraving - other than a few fancy touches - reflect instruments made by that company 70 - 90 years ago, but the actual set up and structure of the instrument is actually like modern-era instruments.
You read down and it says something like "parts made overseas, but assembled in the United States".
"Assembled" could mean as little as "wrapped in plastic, and put into a case".
...so - even though licensed and sold by the company that now owns the name - wouldn't all us us consider such an instrument to be a - de facto - forgery?
Were it that someone was interested in one (as only XXX are going to be made and sold) would the strategy be to wait until all are made/sold, and then wait a couple of years for them to be offered with "Schiller Elite" engraved on them?
...not knock-offs, but full-blown forgeries (with the name and everything engraved on them).
A FEW of the forgeries (and I've encountered a few like this) are every bit as good as the real thing, but - yet - are not the real thing.
I just saw where an American company (known historically by us for many models of tubas, but not-so-much now) just introduced a (NOT-a-tuba) new model of woodwind.
big deal...anniversary of the founding of the company, etc...limited production, and all that stuff...
The cosmetics and engraving - other than a few fancy touches - reflect instruments made by that company 70 - 90 years ago, but the actual set up and structure of the instrument is actually like modern-era instruments.
You read down and it says something like "parts made overseas, but assembled in the United States".
"Assembled" could mean as little as "wrapped in plastic, and put into a case".
...so - even though licensed and sold by the company that now owns the name - wouldn't all us us consider such an instrument to be a - de facto - forgery?
Were it that someone was interested in one (as only XXX are going to be made and sold) would the strategy be to wait until all are made/sold, and then wait a couple of years for them to be offered with "Schiller Elite" engraved on them?